For all of the previous texts we have read in this class I have been able to pinpoint what exactly I like and dislike about them. However, I am having a difficult time pinpointing what it is about Eddie Campbell's The Fate of the Artist that captivated my attention. As I said in class, the book as a whole made me feel incredibly anxious, but I am not entirely sure why. There is no uniformity to the style, so I never knew what to expect when I turned the page; I could be faced with all text or a Honeybee comic-strip or pictures of Campbell's teenage daughter. Perhaps it was this element of surprise that contributed to my eagerness to finish the book, but it was not a particularly enjoyable read at the time.
Upon finishing The Fate of the Artist I read the interview with Campbell in "The Comics Journal" and my mind was changed completely. I went back over the book and was not consumed with the same anxiety I had the first time around. Obviously, I knew what was going to happen this time so there was no room for surprise, but I think it was the things that Campbell had to say which made me feel more at ease. I personally found him genuinely likable and proud of his contributions to the graphic novel genre. I did not pick up on the same air of pretension that many others in the class did, but instead I found him to be a truly ambitious and dedicated artist. Re-reading the book with this interview in mind made me more aware of the stylistic risks Campbell took and how the lack of structure was more of a personal experiment in form than a mind trick on the reader. Though this is by no means my favorite book we have read thus far, it is probably the one that I most admire.
Thursday, November 8, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
I too was glad to read the interview by Campbell (and other stuff on the web), as it showed his depth of thought and range of ideas (while also confusing me ... see my blogpost for more on that). I think he's guilty more of ego than pretension (but adds enough humor to soften things before they really annoy you), and thus I think that's why your comment on admiring it (while not holding it above other books I've read) rang very clear for me.
I agree. While the interview definitely didn't change my mind about Campbell being pretentious, it showed me that it stemmed in a genuine desire to push the medium--and himself--as far as it can go.
Post a Comment